The purpose of this seminar organised and hosted by West Mercia Police in Worcester on 9th November was to have an update on the police trials involving eight police forces in England and Wales. Around 150 delegates attended, mainly ranking police officers but also representatives from housing associations and local authorities. Simon Edens Assistant Chief Constable of West Mercia Police is the ACPO national lead on ASB so I believe that the force is influential in the future direction of how the police will deal with complaints and incidents in future.
Chief Inspector Jim Baker of West Mercia Police said that “harm” is now the prime criteria for the police; the intention is to simply the reporting process, identify who is best to deal with ASB and importantly to share information. He said there are too many tools, powers and too much bureaucracy. The ideal aim is have “an end to end case management system from initial call to resolution of the case to the victim’s satisfaction”. Not sure if he means nationally or by police force – I assume the latter.
Jim Baker identified the need for better use of technology to share incident and personal profile information using a data platform, a common set of casework principles and an agreed risk assessment matrix with more use of IT systems. He welcomed the move to the three new definitions of ASB of personal, nuisance and environmental.
Peter Alleyne of the Home Office started by saying that a staggering 3.3 million (9,000 per day) ASB incidents had been recorded by police in 2010/11 and that this is considered to be a low figure. It is now recognised that much ASB is actually crime and can cause serious harm to victims and communities. Government’s priority, not withstanding the economic situation, is that police and their partners must deal with ASB. There will be no “directives” from government and no “targets” The expectation is that Police and Crime Commissioners will reflect elector’s priorities with ASB high on their agendas. The next steps are feedback from the police trials, to build on the experiences and share it with others but the underlying message is localism – what works for communities.
Geraldine Brown also from the Home Office presented an overview of the findings to date from the police trials. She identified partnership working as a key element (no surprise there then!) with co-location (police sharing office space with partners, especially housing associations) as being particularly effective. The allocation of responsibility with the police being the lead agency may not always be the best way to deal with incidents e.g. social housing landlords could be better placed in some instances. On risk and the identification of possible harm it should not be the sole responsibility of the police and the matrix must be a guide and talking to victims and making a professional judgement was essential. Data Protection is a barrier with incompatibility of IT systems being common, however workarounds are now being found.
Barriers to better working were given as an embedded culture, police preferring to deal with crime and tending to ignore ASB or give it a low priority, engaging with mental health, bureaucracy, IT (again and again), call centre performance, number of agencies (partners), police force boundaries and the financial climate and staff resources.
Jim Baker talked about the West Mercia trial based on Telford & Wrekin with ASB being dealt with alongside Wrekin Housing Trust. Of 2691 calls received between April and September 2011, 158 were referred to the police. The team achieved a 23% reduction in ASB reporting in one year. They identified, on average, one high risk case per month, 13 medium risk and 38 for the force area. Hate crime was revealed as most the vulnerable group and most reluctant victims to complain. Friction over sharing of information causes delays.
There were 4 plenary sessions with presentations from various police forces on:-
- Risk Assessment.
- Culture Change -Sussex Police spoke about the need to train front line officers in ASB and to take it much more seriously than they do now.
- Data Sharing and IT – great interest in this with no recommendations or conclusions other than the urgent need to find a way that is cost effective and “works”and that current DP legislation is a major issue.
- Partnership Working.
Conclusion:
It was a very worthwhile and informative day. A great deal of progress has been made and the police accept their lead role in tackling ASB but with some reluctance from rank and file police officers. Data protection and sharing of information remains a major problem with most sharing being at the local level, informal and by word of mouth. The chances of an early resolution to data sharing is, in my view very low and for me the catch phrase that sums it up is “Dare to Share”.
Mike Blomer
Related articles
- Tackling ASB: the new reality (reactasb.wordpress.com)
Posted by mikereact 
